Oppression and discrimination are caused by an attempt to standardize everything and discourage diversity. My experiences of learning mathematics were somewhat oppressive because creativity was not valued. Only one right answer was allowed and students were expected to use the methods taught by the teachers. The successful student is defined as the one that can accurately solve math problems in a given time; in other words, good performance on tests. As a result, the focus was on the answer but not the process of problem solving. It is during the process of problem solving where creativity of each student can be shown. Each student might come up with different ways to solve a certain problem and all the methods should be valued by the teacher.
In Inuit mathematics, the importance of their culture and community is taken into account when teaching the students. For example, they have base-20 system and they use their own sense of space that is practical to their environment. While we use paper-and-pen exercises to learn mathematics, Inuit students learn it by observing an elder or listening to enigmas. This approach of teaching mathematics allows diversity and creativity. They also get to learn mathematics in their own language for first three years in school. They have mathematical terms in their language that would make more sense to them.
Immigrating to Canada definitely had the biggest influence on how I “read the world.” I went to an elementary school with very diverse student population where I was exposed to different cultural perspectives. This made me learn to view things from different aspects which prevents “single stories” and its consequences. Despite my oppression as a non-White person in Canada, I am still privileged due to my economic class, sexual orientation, etc. These privileges make it very difficult to live without biases against others because we want to feel comfortable by only seeing thigs through certain lenses. It is not enough just to be exposed to the diversity in order to unlearn the biases. In the diverse environment, we need to start by accepting that we are privileged in some way and recognize the beliefs that come from those privileges.
Because I went to a Catholic high school, a lot of things were taught from White people’s perspective. The textbooks barely had Indigenous perspectives or other cultures’ beliefs and values. This led to many students having stereotypes against other race, especially Indigenous people. Throughout my schooling, Indigenous people’s truth certainly did not matter as much as the White people’s until I took Native Studies 30. This was the only course in high school that carefully examined the Indigenous people’s perspectives and where their truth mattered. We were taught valuable lessons about Indigenous people from their perspective which helped us realize that “single stories” can be very dangerous.
The school curricula are developed, revised, and implemented by many parties through complex process. Different groups of people that can provide different points of view on curriculum take part in the process in order to agree on the curriculum that can best guide students in their learning experience. While expert opinion matters, the public also has great influence on curriculum. The goal is to create a curriculum that include important information for students to learn in each grade level. One thing that surprises me is the number of different parties that influence curriculum development. This includes politicians, parents, teachers, principals, subject matter experts from schools and universities, postsecondary institutions, and even business groups. The rationale behind this is to ensure to find a balance between each party’s specific need and desire from the curriculum.
The first couple pages of the Treaty Education document acknowledges many people that contributed to the development of the curriculum. It is clear that many different perspectives are included in the process including experts from postsecondary institutions and Indigenous people. This helps students to learn what is believed to be the most important for them. The curriculum document also indicates specific goals that need to be met by the end of Grade 12. However, there is still controversy on the amount of time that should be spent on subjects like Indigenous Studies. There might have been tension due to such a limited time to teach Indigenous Studies while there are plenty of topics to discuss.
The purpose of teaching Treaty Ed or FNMI Content and Perspectives is more than simply teaching students to acknowledge that we are on Indigenous people’s land. We need to engage students with Canadian history that led to current situation through Treaty Ed. Even when there are few or no First Nations, Metis, and Inuit peoples, Treaty Ed matters because the process of reconciliation requires adequate knowledge and responsibilities from non-Indigenous people. In order to improve our relationship with the Indigenous people, it is important to face each other despite the historical divides. We also need to be aware of the benefits and responsibilities that result in sharing the land and honour the history of land.
We are all treaty people because we share this land. It also means that it is our responsibility to remember what has happened in the past and act accordingly. With the idea that we are on Indigenous people’s land, we need to respect them and their resources. We need to understand each other so we don’t harm anyone and believe that our actions in the present can improve our future.
The project aimed to bring Elders and youth together to learn about the Mushkegowuk Cree meaning of the land and the importance of paquataskamik to the life in Fort Albany First Nation. During the project, the participants observed the significance of Albany River to the Mushkegowuk people. The river is more than just a resource: it is physical, emotional, and spiritual significance to the Mushkegowuk people. For example, one’s deceased family members are buried near the river. The river is also used for fishing, hunting, camping, and children are raised on it. The river contains life, growth, and it brings the people and communities together. The Albany River teaches us what it means to live well with others in our total environments. Another part of the project was to promote the use of original names and Cree concepts to the youth. According to some community members, the Residential School had impact on the decreased number of people who speak Indigenous language fluently. It is important for them to continue to sustain their identity through defining values to their life in their own terms. Recovering intergenerational relationships and promoting traditional beliefs are part of decolonization in the project.
As a teacher, it is my responsibility to address different ways for students to learn from the history of our land and environment. Students must learn to respect and value different identities and concepts of land. This process is possible through teaching students about the importance and necessity of reinhabitation and decolonization.
Respond to the following prompts: What does it mean to be a “good” student according to the commonsense? Which students are privileged by this definition of the good student? What is made impossible to see/understand/believe because of these commonsense ideas?
According to the commonsense, a “good” student is the one that gains knowledge that is favoured by the teacher and the school, in a specific way as instructed by the teachers. No matter what the student’s knowledge was prior to starting school, the commonsense approach in education works to teach students in a way that only values certain knowledge and beliefs. “Good” students in terms of commonsense are limited in many aspects as they are the models desired by the teachers, schools, and the society.
Because students are limited to certain knowledge and ways of teaching, only those who conform are privileged by it: it is very often the students that come from the dominant culture or the ones that embody the status quo. When students are taught and treated with commonsensical ideas, they do not seek the need to feel uncomfortable and then disrupt the norms. As a result, students and teachers keep reinforcing the oppressive status quo. This creates an environment where only certain group of students are privileged and considered as “good” students. Learning through crisis plays an important role here because it is crucial to recognize and challenge the oppression that affects many students everyday.
The topic that I have chosen for this assignment is “Race and the curriculum.” Although it may not be obvious to everyone, current curriculum is centred around the privileged people which leaves certain group of people out. As Canada grows more diverse, it is essential to adjust the curriculum in a way that values and benefits every race. Educators need to respond to this change by challenging the problems of current curriculum.
The article that caught my eye was “Race, Diversity, and Curriculum in the Era of Globalization.” The authors focus on diversity and inclusion approaches in education in accordance with changes that occur in 21st-century. They define globalization as constant exposure to new identities as educators face difference and multiplicity. As globalization occurs, there are things to be done in schools to improve the curriculum and quality of teaching to promote diverse education system.
The next step for this assignment is to find articles on how teachers are implementing diverse and inclusive education in their classrooms. The outcome or effects of such curriculum will provide critical feedback on current situation and what educators can do to improve it. I am hoping to find recent articles since this topic, race and the curriculum, is progressing in our society rapidly.
1. Curriculum as a syllabus to be transmitted
This model focuses on the most effective way to deliver the knowledge to students. Its benefit is the familiarity to students when it comes to courses leading to exams. However, this model does not indicate the importance or order of the material to be studied as it is the traditional textbook approach. When educators choose to adapt this model, it is likely that they only focus on the content of knowledge.
2. Curriculum as product
This model is systematic and organized. One can clearly view the notion of outcome which makes organizing the content and method easy. Students can be evaluated based on their results or the products. On the other side, the restricted organization approach of this model limits students and educators in their learning/teaching experience. Students are told exactly what they are supposed to do which limits the opportunity for classroom interactions. As a result, both the students and the educators may not realize the importance of learning that is the result of interactions.
3. Curriculum as process
This model views curriculum as the classroom interaction rather than a physical thing. This model does not provide a series of materials or syllabus to be taught; it is an attempt or experiment in classrooms. Students have a clear voice in this environment because the focus is on learning, not teaching, due to the emphasis on interactions. However, there is a limit to variation of this approach as many students and their parents prioritize performance on exams as success of the course.
4. Curriculum as praxis
This model is based on the process model but further focuses on emancipation. The curriculum is developed through the interaction of action and reflection as students and educators go through a process of negotiation and recognition of problems. During this process, students face the problems of their existence and will face their own oppression.
In my experience, curriculum as a syllabus to be transmitted was the most prominent one. For many classes that I had in high school, the teachers made sure that we were on track with the curriculum because we had to learn everything as planned in each semester. This model helped us prepare for exams but did not allow much creativity and classroom interactions.
Respond to the following writing prompt in two to three paragraphs: How does Kumashiro define ‘commonsense?’ Why is it so important to pay attention to the ‘commonsense’?
People do certain things everyday as part of their daily routines. People also take certain ideas and values for granted. They do not think hard about why and how they are doing those actions or have certain beliefs. The same thing applies for the education system as addressed by Kumashiro. Students and educators repeat the same practice defined as “traditional” to them and they will continue to do it without questioning. For example, it is normal for students in the United States that they go to school from September to June because that is just the way it is. Commonsense is the practices and perspectives that people take for granted but is limited to and only benefits the privileged people.
As Kumashiro states, the commonsense found in the educational system of United States causes oppression. Because commonsense makes privileged people think that they are just practicing what has always been done, they do not realize the need to challenge the oppression. It has been so normal for students and educators to think that ideas other than what they are familiar with are uncomfortable, unnecessary, and inappropriate. In order to reform the current system of education, people must be willing to accept the feeling of discomfort. Anti-oppressive education is challenging and its work is never done; therefore, educators must examine and realize the necessity of anti-oppressive education by paying attention to the “commonsense”.